Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are the author's own personal opinions and do not represent Grasshopr's view in anyway.

© Copyright 2010


Sunlight Foundation's "Cycle of Transparency"

More posts by Grasshopr 3/10/2010 3:34:00 PM

The Sunlight Foundation (we're big fans of Sunlight here at Grasshopr) has been leading the charge to make our government more open and transparent. While there are many high-profile efforts in the area of government transparency, they recognize there's a difference between the concept of transparency and actual implementation of technologies and policies to make it so. 

In an effort to help all of us visualize the players, processes and challenges involved in achieving a more transparent government, they've introduced the "Cycle of Transparency" concept and graphic. As you might guess, advocacy organizations, lobbyists, engaged citizens, and, of course, lawmakers play key roles in the process. 

Check it out here

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: ,

CT Post Op-Ed: People Deserve A Stronger Voice

More posts by CTCCBI 2/24/2010 4:49:00 PM

By John J. Woodcock III

In November 2008, close to 580,000 Connecticut voters said "yes" to a constitutional convention. It was a David vs. Goliath campaign as reflected by the "yes" supporters being outspent by 83-1. A 2008 poll showed Connecticut citizens favoring ballot initiative by 65 percent to 30 percent opposed, with 5 percent undecided. A Hartford Courant article on Oct. 30 announcing the poll results stated "The poll found a correlation between a poor opinion of the General Assembly and support for the ability of citizens to legislate by petition and referendum."

The Connecticut General Assembly has ignored this strong expression of public support for Initiative and Referendum. In the 2009 legislative session, four Initiative and Referendum bills were submitted by legislators. Not one of them received a public hearing, and all died in the Government, Administration and Elections Committee. Yet that same committee gave a public hearing to bills such as "An Act Concerning the State Dance."

Is there a more dramatic example of the General Assembly being unresponsive to the wishes of the Connecticut public?

Connecticut is one of only 19 states without any form of direct democracy. Direct democracy -- namely, Initiative, Referendum and Recall -- comes from the Progressive Era, which began 120 years ago. At that time, Initiative, Referendum and Recall was a direct response to entrenched legislatures being beholden to special interests, such as the railroads, the mining industry and the banking industry. Some would argue that history is repeating itself here in Hartford, and in Washington. Initiative and Referendum is responsible for passing women's suffrage, direct election of United States senators, child safety labor laws, term limits, public financing of elections, medical marijuana, and increasing the minimum wage, to name a few.

Most of our Connecticut elected officials maintain that the present system is working fine, and that legislators are accessible and responsive. If that is so, how do you explain their complete indifference to the 2008 poll results showing 65 percent of Connecticut citizens favoring Initiative and Referendum?

What is documented is that special interest lobbying at our state capitol has increased by 500 percent since 1990. What is also clear is that over one-third of our legislative offices races were uncontested in the 2008 election, and more than 95 percent of incumbents were re-elected. In addition to the obvious entrenchment of our legislators, we see the anemic performances of the public watchdog agencies, the Office of State Ethics, and the State Elections and Enforcement Commission. Both agencies have been substantially enhanced, both in staff and budget, yet enforcement, particularly with the Office of State Ethics, has all but disappeared, especially when compared to its predecessor, the State Ethics Commission. All the while, the public is made aware on a continual basis of frequent missteps by its elected officials.

In October 2008, I debated Attorney General Richard Blumenthal on the constitutional convention question, as well as the issue of citizens having Initiative and Referendum rights. His suggestion at that debate was that the Initiative and Referendum issue should be addressed in the context of a legislative election and not through a constitutional convention. We have heeded the attorney general's advice. A nonpartisan, issue-neutral political action committee called Connecticut Citizens for Ballot Initiative has been formed. The purpose of the committee is to advocate for ballot initiative and to educate the public as to where candidates stand on this critical issue for the 2010 state election this November. Every candidate for state and federal office from all parties will be asked his position on Initiative and Referendum, and we will then publish that position on our Web site, Facebook and other media.

Perhaps in 2011, with a new and more responsive Legislature, the voices of Connecticut citizens will be heard through a long-awaited public hearing on new legislation, which, if made into law, will empower Connecticut citizens and give them a voice in their state government and their state's future.

John J. Woodcock III is chairman of the Connecticut Citizens for Ballot Initiative, a former legislator and former state ethics commissioner.


Currently rated 5.0 by 3 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , , , ,

Obama Funds the HRSA State Grant Program

More posts by BIAAGrassroots 2/1/2010 2:00:00 PM

This morning President Obama released his FY 2011 budget. Last week, the State of the Union address warned of spending freezes and tough decisions on what programs to keep and what programs to discontinue in the coming year. 

BIAA is pleased to announce that the HRSA state grant program, authorized by the TBI Act, has been level funded in the President's budget. 

Although the appropriations process for 2011 is far from over, we are off to a good start.  BIAA would like to make a push for increased appropriations for this program at the 2010 Brain Injury Awareness Day on March 17th on Capitol Hill.  Please contact Sarah D'Orsie, Director of Government Affairs, BIAA at sdorsie@biausa.org if you are planning to attend.


Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , ,

BIAA Health Care Reform Update

More posts by BIAAGrassroots 2/1/2010 1:51:00 PM

After the devastating Massachusetts special election, House and Senate leaders are expected to resume negotiations this week to attempt to finish the health care overhaul. Although a clear path is still unknown, BIAA will continue to monitor the situation closely. A big thank you to all of our grassroots advocates who answered the call last week to urge members of Congress to push forward on Health Care Reform!

State Concussion Legislation

Following the extraordinary success of BIA of Washington and BIA of Oregon in the adoption of state level sports concussion legislation, BIAA, in partnership with the Sports Legacy Institute, has become committed to encouraging, and assisting wherever possible, the enactment of sports concussion legislation in all states.

BIAA has developed a sample piece of legislation based on current laws and pending bills that exist throughout the country. This model legislation along with a sample testimony for use in state concussion hearings, distributed on January 25, 2010 to BIAA’s state affiliates, is a step foward in facilitating action in each state. 

Due to the increased visibility of sports concussions within the National Football League in recent weeks, BIAA is encouraged that all states will be able to tip the scales in favor of protecting our youth athletes.

Brain Injury Awareness Day 2010

This year’s Brain Injury Awareness Day on Capitol Hill is set to take place on March, 17, 2010. BIAA will be unveiling our 2010 legislative agenda and encouraging the grassroots community along with state affiliates to participate in advocating for increased TBI Act appropriations, increased access to care, federal and state level concussion legislation, increased TBI research, military coverage of cognitive rehabilitation and caregiver assistance. 

All issues mentioned will be outlined in fact sheets that advocates will receive that day and can use as reference during congressional visits and may leave behind for review by congressional staff.

Below is the schedule of events for the day:

10:00 AM – 1:00 PM - Brain Injury Awareness Fair, First Floor Foyer of the Rayburn House Office Building
2:30 PM – 4:00 PM - Briefing: “From the Playground to the Pros: A Heads-Up on Concussion”, Capitol Visitors Center – Congressional Meeting Room South
5:30 PM – 7:30 PM - Reception Celebrating Brain Injury Awareness Month, First Floor Foyer of the Rayburn House Office Building

The Policy Corner is made possible by the Centre for Neuro Skills, James F. Humphreys and Associates, and Lakeview.  Brain Injury Association of America gratefully acknowledges their support for legislative action.b


Call Congress and tell them to Pass Health Care Reform Now!

More posts by BIAAGrassroots 1/29/2010 2:17:00 PM

CALL THE CAPITOL SWITCHBOARD AT 800-828-0498


Over the past week, you may have seen news reports suggesting that health care reform is in serious jeopardy. WE MUST INSIST THAT CONGRESS COMPLETE HEALTH CARE REFORM NOW!

Too many Americans with disabilities and chronic conditions are not well served by the current system and will make tremendous gains through enactment of health care reform.

Take action NOW! Starting TODAY and continuing until the final votes on legislation, call your members of Congress and tell them NOT TO GIVE UP ON AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES AND CHRONIC CONDITIONS! TELL THEM THAT YOU WANT THEM TO CONTINUE FIGHTING FOR HEALTH CARE REFORM!!!


  • Health care reform will end discrimination based on health status in the private market - discrimination that currently leaves millions of vulnerable Americans uninsured
  • Health care reform will include new, affordable voluntary long term care insurance coverage—the CLASS Act—and expand Medicaid coverage for home and community based services
  • Health care reform will expand Medicaid eligibility and provide subsidies in the private market, creating more affordable coverage for people with disabilities
  • Health care reform will prohibit annual and lifetime limits on coverage so that individuals with serious conditions will not be forced into medical bankruptcy


CALL THE CAPITOL SWITCHBOARD AT 800-828-0498. (If you can't get through on the 800 number, call the Capitol switchboard (202-224-3121) or your member's district office.)

Tell your Senators and Representatives that NOW is the time for Congress to complete meaningful health care reform that prevents discrimination against people with pre-existing conditions, includes the CLASS Act and expands coverage of Medicaid home and community based services. 

People with disabilities and their families cannot wait any longer for relief! 


Thank Dateline NBC for Bringing Attention to Brain Injury Challenges

More posts by BIAAGrassroots 1/29/2010 2:07:00 PM

Health care reform at the federal level is officially on hold. Republican Scott Brown gained the Massachusetts seat vacated by the death of Edward Kennedy, thereby breaking the 60-vote majority in the Senate. Democrats met privately in the days following the Massachusetts special election but were unable to cultivate a strategy for moving forward at this time. A six‐week break is planned, and it is likely policymakers will be forced to accept a substantially scaled‐back package or abandon health care reform altogether.

The Brain Injury Association of America is deeply disappointed. Through our partnership with the Brain Injury Business & Professional Council, we made important gains in the proposed legislation. We cannot forgo this progress; we cannot quit now. We will continue to fight for access to the full continuum of brain injury treatment.

On January 24, 2010, Dateline NBC aired the compelling story of Patrick Gannon,
a man who battled a severe anoxic brain injury and was then forced to wage war against his insurance company. The Dateline story accurately portrays how the health care system victimizes patients and families when they are most vulnerable.

I urge brain injury advocates everywhere to watch Patrick’s story and then write to Ann Curry, Dateline correspondent, to thank her for bringing national attention to the extraordinary challenges individuals with brain injury and their families face. I urge advocates to share their own stories with Ms. Curry and ask that she continue to educate the public about the rehabilitation needs of people with brain injury after their lives have been saved. Please address your letters to:

Ms. Ann Curry
Dateline / NBC News
30 Rockefeller Center, Studio 3B
New York, NY 10012

E-mail: Dateline@NBCUNI.com

Once you’ve written your letter (and sent copies to your legislators and BIAA), I ask that you share the Dateline story with friends and neighbors and that you encourage them to spread the story to others. With your help, we can tell the public that a brain injury can happen to anyone at anytime and that having insurance doesn’t mean you’re covered!

Very truly yours,

Susan H. Connors
President/CEO

Please send copies of your letters to your state and federal legislators and to me at BIAA’s address!


Brain Injury Association of America
1608 Spring Hill Road, Suite 110 
Vienna, VA  22182 

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , , , ,

CIA lying, Pelosi not talking and non communication for our own good?

More posts by coachlynn 7/9/2009 11:57:00 PM

Our country relies on our intelligence agencies to "spy" for the sake of keeping our country safe.  But is our system broken when the Speaker of the House is silenced even when she is given information that sees that some of our own intelligence authorities are doing non ---- intelligent things?

We depend on our Intelligent Agencies as more than a system.

It is a part of our very fabric.

However, when the fight for disclosure and oversight becomes a fight between parties, an argument over whether our Speaker of the House is speaking out of turn, what happens to the real issues of:

Peventive detention

Boterrorism

Uprisings in Iran

And many other issues of concern.

SHould there be oversight of our Intelligence Agencies?

Should we be given inforamtion - full disclosure over matters of Intelligence?

Should our very own intelligence agencies be given their own authority to "watch" themselves and grant no one else this power?

Intelligence information only works when it is truthful, effective, preventive, comprehensive and most of all regulated and enforced!

Coach Lynn


Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

The Microgrid Approach To Energy Reform

More posts by leeanthony 6/26/2009 11:35:00 AM

This is a well-thought out, calculable approach that directly addresses our need for energy reform.

The technology is sound and well-studied. The problem as I see it is getting

"Waxman and his colleagues take the time to consider a local approach" 

to anything. The idea of a national or continental "backbone" grid is absurd from

many angles.  This article explains a few of the "whys" of the Microgrid approach.


Currently rated 5.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Why We Created Grasshopr

More posts by Grasshopr 6/12/2009 4:36:00 PM

The System’s Broken

In our democracy, a lot of attention gets paid to voting and elections. Sadly, not enough attention gets paid to what happens between elections – communications between constituents and their elected officials. This important aspect of our democracy is broken. Badly.

It’s broken because of the sheer volume of email Congress receives each year. The Congressional Management Foundation estimates they receive more than 350 million emails per year and staff sizes remain the same. They’re simply overwhelmed.

It’s broken because there’s a trust gap. Spam, astroturf and proxy email campaigns have eroded a sense of trust that real people are taking real action. Elected officials and their staff don’t know who’s real and who isn’t. Who intended to contact them and who didn’t. Who’s a constituent and who isn’t.

It’s broken because the tools for advocacy are only available to well-funded organizations. They have the resources to kick up so much dust that many other voices get lost in the shuffle. All interests are special, but some interests are more special than others when a few can wage massive email campaigns.

Elected officials want to hear from their constituents and build stronger relationships. Individuals want their voices heard, and of course organizations want their members concerns heard. The status quo works against these goals.

We Created Grasshopr to Address these Issues

We created Grasshopr to give organizations, individuals, and elected officials an authentic, sustainable, and efficient means of engaging on issues at the federal, state, and local level. By "organization," I mean an officially-registered nationwide association or an informal small town grassroots community group. A non-profit or a company. A political party organization or a talk radio show audience. Wherever a group of people come together because of common interests, causes, or issue positions, Grasshopr can help.

Organizations should have a platform for their members to communicate, collaborate, and engage in the public policy process. They should be able to know which legislative districts their members fall in and target their communications, event notifications, and advocacy alerts accordingly.  

Elected officials should know when those communicating with them are real people who took action themselves on their own accord. They should be able to manage the communications process efficiently so they can concentrate on the job their constituents sent them to office to do.

And organizations are more effective when they tap into their most valuable resource: People. Engaging individual members in conversation and collaboration is better than blasting one-way emails.

Everyone benefits when individuals are engaged and advocacy is authentic.

- Andrew, Jon, and Sujay


Currently rated 5.0 by 4 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: